S 46 0 Geschrieben 4. August 2009 Geschrieben 4. August 2009 @ djlivus: FIRST !! It should read first... it was too early this morning....sorry.And you have Mail....@ lina357: Fixing the tower to a building could have been a very good reason to switch back to a top slewing unit too. Imagine a 850m K25000 building the Burj tower in Dubai... ...ok,ok, I`m only kidding. Wrong crane for this building. Zitieren
djlivus 0 Geschrieben 4. August 2009 Autor Geschrieben 4. August 2009 I think you`re right, next reason could be ability of fixing the tower to the building at greater heights. Kroll k-10000 and kroll k-25000 from 80s were not top slewing ,because they had no necessary technologyto make them so. It is much more economical to make a tower crane top slewing than bottom slewing. At a big crane like k-10000 the tower weighs hundreds of tonnes , so ,much energy is needed to revolve it. Almost all hammer head tower cranes are top slewing, as far as I know. Or is much easier to revolve only the upper part of the crane...You are also right, of course. If a crane is bottom slewing it can not be braced to the building Zitieren
djlivus 0 Geschrieben 4. August 2009 Autor Geschrieben 4. August 2009 Potain md series inspired many chinese tower cranes. Here an MD22000 and an d his chinesse counterpart m2200. still, I think m2200 is inspired by the old potain md-2200, because it has no new vision cab Zitieren
linaprin 1 Geschrieben 5. August 2009 Geschrieben 5. August 2009 QUOTE(djlivus @ 04.08.09 - 14:25) ←Kroll k-10000 and kroll k-25000 from 80s were not top slewing ,because they had no necessary technologyto make them so.Which technology do you mean? QUOTE(djlivus @ 04.08.09 - 14:25) ←It is much more economical to make a tower crane top slewing than bottom slewing. At a big crane like k-10000 the tower weighs hundreds of tonnes , so ,much energy is needed to revolve it. Almost all hammer head tower cranes are top slewing, as far as I know. Or is much easier to revolve only the upper part of the crane...You are also right, of course. If a crane is bottom slewing it can not be braced to the buildingIn fact Kroll had choosen a bad solution, I think...after early 50` no bottom slewing hammer head tower cranes were manufactured. Zitieren
djlivus 0 Geschrieben 5. August 2009 Autor Geschrieben 5. August 2009 KB-674 russian tower crane. Although it is not a huge tower crane, it is still a big crane. Kb674A has a maximum height under hook of 85 meters and the maximum load is 25 tonnes. Together withnewer Kb-676 it is used for construction of building up to 25 floors or even more. It also can be met on power plant construction site, as well. Zitieren
Recommended Posts
Diskutiere mit!
Du kannst jetzt antworten und Dich später anmelden. Wenn du bereits einen Account hast kannst du dich hier anmelden.